Kalimuthu v. Ramalingam
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the same, leading to closure of the connected Miscellaneous Petition.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.03.2018 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.14 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD)No.74 of 2018 Kalimuthu ... Petitioner / Petitioner / Plaintiff
vs.
1.Ramalingam 2.Lakshmanan 3.Chockalingam ... Respondents / Respondents / Defendants
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to fair and decreetal order passed by learned District Munsif, Devakottai in I.A.No.906 of 2017 in O.S.No.82 of 2015 dated 10.11.2017 and set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For R1 & R3 : Mr.K.N.Govardhanan For R2 : No appearance
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner represented that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
2.In view of the above submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KALIMUTHU
- respondent
R1. RAMALINGAM
- respondent
R2. LAKSHMANAN
- respondent
R3. CHOCKALINGAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court