Disposed

A.Selvarani, v. R.Jegadeesan

Madras HC10 Apr 2018CRP(MD)/133/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 seeking to review a lower court order granting time extension for suit disposal. The High Court bench reviewed the request for extension due to staff vacancies and procedural delays, ultimately directed the Principal District Munsif to dispose of the suit within six months from the date of receipt of the order.

What did the court decide?

Time extended for six months to dispose of the suit under O.S. No.239 of 2012, effective from receipt of order.

A.Selvarani, Vs R.Jegadeesan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Sixth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon'ble Mrs.Justice S.RAMATHILAGAM

¶6

CRP(MD) No.133 of 2018

¶7

A.SELVARANI ... PETITIONER

1 R.JEGADEESAN

2 NATESAN

3 BALAVINAYAGAR TEMPLE, MUHILANVILAI, REP BY ITS TRUSTEE, MATHUSOOTHANAPURAM VILLAGE, AGASTHEESWARAM TALUK, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS

¶12

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No.580 of 2017 in OS.No.239 of 2012 dated 17/11/2017 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil.

¶13

ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the letter received from the Principal District Munsif (FAC), Nagercoil, dated 18.12.2018 in D.No.749/2018 and the grounds of Petition, earlier order of this Court and the material papers of the Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.NIRANJAN.S.KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner, this Court made the following order:-

¶14

The matter has been listed today under the caption 'for extension of time'.

¶15

2.This Court by an order dated 10.04.2018 in the Civil Revision Petition, has directed the learned Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, to dispose of the suit in O.S. No.239 of 2012, within a period of six months.

¶16

3.Now, the learned Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, vide letter dated 18.12.2018 has requested extension of time stating that the amendment was carried out by the plaintiff's counsel on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 20.06.2018 and the defendants filed their additional written statements on 11.07.2018 and the Suit was posted for trial on

¶17

¶18

18.07.2018. He further submitted that the post of Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, and I Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil were vacant and he was being the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil, was placed in-charge for the post of Principal District Court and I Additional District Munsif Court, Nagercoil from 04.12.2018. Now the suit is in the stage of P.W.1's cross examination.

¶19

4.Hence, time is extended for six months and the learned Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, is directed to dispose of the suit within six months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-)

¶23

¶24

THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT MUNSIF (FAC), NAGERCOIL.

¶25

ORDER DATED : 06.02.2019

¶26

ORDER

¶27

CRP(MD) No.133 of 2018

¶28

Giving direction and etc., as stated within.

¶29

TE/SV/SAR:2 : 18/02/2019 : 2P/2C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Selvarani, v. R.Jegadeesan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Selvarani, v. R.Jegadeesan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Director Vs T. Ramakrishnan

K.Rakkammal, Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport

Kandasamy Vs Sathishkumar

Dr.S. Vel Aravind Managing Vs Dr. Radhakrishnan

The Manager Vs Vennila

Veerachamy, Vs the Branch Manager