Anbalagan v. Saroja
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging a dismissal of a transfer order petition. The court held the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations against the Presiding Officer with any evidence, warranting no interference.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP(PD).No.952 of 2018
and CMP.No.5100 of 2018
Anbalagan .. Petitioner
Vs
1.Saroja
Rep.by General Power of Attorney,
Santhakumari,
Maruthur South Sethi Village,
Vedaranyam Taluk and DMC
2.Meenambal
3.Subamala .. Respondents
PRAYER
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 12.12.2017
passed in Tr.O.P.No.29 of 2017 on the file of the Principal District Judge,
Tiruvarur.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kothandaraman
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition is taken up for final disposal at
2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the lower court's dismissal of a transfer order petition based on an unproven allegation by the petitioner against a Presiding Officer.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anbalagan
- respondent
Saroja
- respondent
Meenambal
- respondent
Subamala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court