Arulmozhi v. Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
Per curiam. The petitioner sought withdrawal of the filed Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. The Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, with connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP(PD).No.873 of 2017
and
CMP.Nos.4265 & 4266 of 2017
Arulmozhi .. Petitioner
Vs
Suresh, S/o K.Mahalingam,
Rep. by his Power Agent,
K.Mahalingam, Benjaro Palace
Dor Mettary, Singapore,
permanently residing at Puliyanthope
Thethakudi South, Vedaranyam Taluk,
Nagapattinam District. .. Respondent
PRAYER
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order of the learned
Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam in IA.No.129 of 2015 in HMOP.No.78 of
2015 dated 04.12.2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Kuyilan
For Respondent : Mr.P.Vijendran
2
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arulmozhi
- respondent
Suresh
Coram
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court