S. Dhanalakshmi v. C.R.Rajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution as not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, who had endorsed this stance.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition were dismissed and closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(PD)No.86 of 2014
& M.P.No.1 of 2014
1.S.Dhanalakshmi
2.Sudalaimani .. Petitioners
Vs.
C.R.Rajan .. Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 19.12.2013 passed in I.A.No.16709 of 2013 in O.S.No.3910 of 2013 on the file of the II Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioners : Mr.V.G.Suresh Kumar
For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he is not
pressing the Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Dhanalakshmi
- petitioner
Sudalaimani
- respondent
C.R.Rajan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court