The High Court at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution as infructuous because the underlying Order Review Application had already been disposed of on merits.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.01.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
CRP (PD) No.728 of 2015
1.J.Dhanabakkiam
2.N.Jayavelu ... Petitioners
vs.
Union of India
Southern Railway rep.by
its General Manager
Chennai – 600 003 ... Respondent
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India against the order dated 21.01.2015 made in I.A.No.9/2015 in O.A. (II-U) 58/2014 on the file of Railway Tribunal Claims at Chennai.
For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar Standing counsel for Railways
2
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 21.01.2015 made in I.A.No.9/2015 in O.A. (II-U) 58/2014 on the file of Railway Tribunal Claims at Chennai.
representation for the petitioners. The learned counsel appearing for
the respondent submitted that O.A. (II-U) 58/2014 itself has been
dismissed on merits on 18.08.2015 and nothing survives in this Civil
Revision Petition.
05.01.2018
rgr
To
The Railway Claims Tribunal,
Chennai.
3
rgr
V.M.VELUMANI, J.
CRP (PD) No.728 of 2015
05.01.2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Civil Revision Petition should be admitted when the underlying Order Review Application has been dismissed on merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
J.Dhanabakkiam and N.Jayavelu
Union of India
V.M. Velumani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
