Disposed

E.Kothandapani v. Sensex Financial Services P.

Madras HC2 Jan 2018CRP/622/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, the Madras High Court noted that the underlying suit was filed in 2008. Without deciding the issue on merits, the Court disposed of the petition by directing the Principal District Munsif to decide the suit within two months.

What did the court decide?

The petition is disposed of directing the Principal District Munsif, Tambaram to dispose of the suit in not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

E.Kothandapani Vs Sensex Financial Services P. — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.01.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶6

C.R.P.(PD)No.622 of 2015
& M.P.No.1 of 2015
1.E.Kothandapani
2.E.Rudramoorthy
3.M.Shanthi .. Petitioners
Vs.
M/s.Sensex Financial Services P. Ltd.,
by its Directors
1.Mohanlal G.Bhandari
2.Jeenendra Bhandari
represented by their Power Agent,
Khimraj Jain. .. Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the judgment and decree made in C.M.A.No.3 of 2009 dated 26.07.2014 on the file of the learned Sub-Judge, Tambaram, confirming the order and decree made in I.A.No.247 of 2008 in O.S.No.59 of 2008 dated 07.01.2009 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Tambaram.

¶8

For Petitioners : Mr.P.Gopalan For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Mr.A.Palaniappan

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the

¶13

judgment and decree made in C.M.A.No.3 of 2009 dated 26.07.2014 on the file of the learned Sub-Judge, Tambaram, confirming the order and decree made in I.A.No.247 of 2008 in O.S.No.59 of 2008 dated 07.01.2009 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Tambaram.

¶14

2.The petitioners are the defendants and respondents

¶15

are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.59 of 2008 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Tambaram. The respondents filed the said suit against the petitioners for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. Pending suit, the respondents filed I.A.No.247 of 2008 for interim injunction. After contest, by the order dated 07.01.2009, interim injunction was granted. Against the order of interim injunction, the petitioners filed C.M.A.No.3 of 2009

¶16

on the file of the Sub Court, Tambaram. The learned Appellate Judge, considering the materials on record and order of the learned District Munsif, by the judgment dated 26.07.2014, dismissed the appeal.

¶17

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶18

¶19

3.Against the said judgment of dismissal dated 26.07.2014 made in C.M.A.No.3 of 2009, confirming the order dated 07.01.2009 made in I.A.No.247 of 2008 in O.S.No.59 of

¶20

2008, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners.

¶21

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well

¶22

as the second respondent and perused the materials available on record. Though notice was served on the first respondent and his name is printed in the cause list, there is no representation either in person or through counsel.

¶23

5.From the materials on record, it is seen that the suit is filed by the respondents in the year 2008 for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The interim injunction granted on 07.01.2009 was confirmed by the learned Appellate Authority in C.M.A.No.3 of 2009 by the order dated 26.07.2014.

¶24

6.Considering the nature of the relief sought for in the suit and the fact that the suit is of the year 2008, without deciding

¶25

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶26

¶27

the issue on merits, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, directing the learned Principal District Munsif, Tambaram to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible in any event, not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

7.With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is
disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous
Petition is closed.
02.01.2018
Index: Yes/No
gsa
To
1.The Subordinate Judge,
Tambaram.
2.The District Munsif,
Tambaram.

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

gsa

C.R.P.(PD)No.622 of 2015
& M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶34

02.01.2018

¶35

http://www.judis.nic.in

E.Kothandapani v. Sensex Financial Services P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.Kothandapani v. Sensex Financial Services P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Neelavathi Vs B.Selvam

Sivalingam Vs Thandavan

S.Gnanasekar Vs T.Thulasi

Ponnusamy Vs Jayamani

Tamizharasan Vs Mrs. Kala

K. Anna durai Vs a .Kannan