P. Amutha v. R. Tamilarasa
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court allowed a limited prayer directing the Principal District Judge, Namakkal, to communicate an order of attachment to the Sub-Registrar, Ambattur within one week, as per Order 38 Rule 11(b) CPC.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Principal District Judge, Namakkal to communicate the order of attachment to the Sub-Registrar, Ambattur within one week.
What the court decided
1
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.12.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
C.R.P.(PD)No. 4457 of 2017
P. Amutha ... Petitioner
Vs
R. Tamilarasa ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the learned Principal District Judge, Namakkal to communicate the order of attachment made in I.A.No.311 of 2016 in O.S.No.119 of 2016 dated 18.07.2016 to the Sub-Registrar, Ambattur.
O R D E R
Limited prayer sought for in the present petition is for a direction to the learned Principal District Judge, Namakkal to communicate the order of
attachment in I.A.No.311 of 2016 in O.S.No.119 of 2016 dated 18.07.2016 to the Sub-Registrar, Ambattur.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court is directed to communicate an impugned order of attachment to the relevant Sub-Registrar under Order 38 Rule 11(b) of the CPC.
Whether a civil revision petition should be allowed if the interlocutory prayer regarding notice is disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Amutha
- respondent
R. Tamilarasa
Coram
M.S.RAMESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court