dismissed as not pressed by virtue of bar under National Trust Act 1999. The learned Judge also considered the fact that the second respondent was not produced before the Medical Board even though I.A.No.1877 of 2009 was allowed exparte on 01.02.2010. From this, it is clear that there is no report from the Medical Board with regard to the mental condition of the second respondent. The learned Judge has extracted the findings of the District Judge, Erode wherein it has been stated that when the second respondent was put question regarding her name, she did not answer but was laughing. Considering these facts, the learned Judge, invoking Section 45 of the Evidence Act has directed the third respondent to produce the second respondent before the court for referring her to the Medical Board i.e. District Chief, Joint Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Government Head Quarters Hospital, Erode. It is pertinent to note that the first respondent has made averments that the life of the second respondent is in danger. Considering all the facts in entirety, the learned Judge has allowed the application by giving cogent and valid reason. There is no irregularity or illegality in the said order impugned in this revision warranting interference by this Court.
