M.Ponraj v. D. Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as the petitioner had already secured favorable fingerprint comparison reports in previous applications. The Court directed the lower court to dispose of the suit within six months.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to dispose of the suit within six months; Civil Revision Petition dismissed; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP (PD) No. 4180 of 2017
and
CMP. No.19584 of 2017
M. Ponraj .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. D. Krishnan
2. S. Devika .. Respondents
PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and final order passed by the Principal District Munsif Court, Alandur dated 08.08.2017 in I.A. No. 711 of 2017 in O.S. No. 787 of 2009 and allow the revision petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.K. Kannan
For Respondents : Mr. J. Ferozkan
O R D E R
The present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition to set aside the dismissal of a fresh application for biometric comparison is sustainable given prior favorable reports on the same matter.
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial court's order dismissing the application for comparison of thumb impression in the registered deed of Power of Attorney.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Ponraj
- respondent
D. Krishnan
- respondent
S. Devika
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court