Dismissed

Parvathi v. Ele Farms

Madras HC4 Dec 2018CRP/3738/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 challenging an order denying a request for a belated opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. The court held no infirmity existed in the trial court's order regarding the delay. The death of the first petitioner was noted, but the petition was ultimately dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Parvathi Vs Ele Farms — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 04.12.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶6

C.R.P. (PD) No. 3738 of 2018
and
C.M.P. No. 20850 of 2018
1. Parvathi
2. Saravanan ...Petitioners
Vs
Ele Farms,
Rep. by its Managing Director,
Devadoss, S/o.Raghava Reddi,
No.130, T.H.Road, Kaladipet,
Thiruvottriyur,
Chennai – 600019. ...Respondent

¶7

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order of dismissal passed in I.A.No.583 of 2018 in O.S.No.1 of 2005 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Ponneri, Thiruvallur District.

¶8

For Petitioners : Mr.T.P.Sekar

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioners herein have filed a memo stating that after filing of

¶13

the Civil Revision Petition, the 1^st petitioner herein expired on 19.11.2008. The death of the 1^st petitioner herein is recorded and the 2^nd petitioner herein is granted liberty to take steps for bringing the representatives of the first petitioner herein on record, before the trial Court.

¶14

The reasoning of the Court below that the petitioner was earlier

¶15

given an opportunity to re-call, re-open and re-examine the respondent witness on 21.12.2012 and that the petitioner herein had not cross examined his witnesses for the past six years, seems to be unacceptable, when due opportunities were already granted to the petitioner herein. When the case was at the stage of arguments, another application at this belated stage may not deserve consideration. As such, I do not find any infirmity in the order of

¶16

the trial Court.

¶17

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶18

04.12.2018

¶19

Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No hvk

¶20

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶21

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

M.S.RAMESH.,J

hvk

C.R.P. (PD) No. 3738 of 2018
and
C.M.P. No. 20850 of 2018

¶27

04.12.2018

¶28

http://www.judis.nic.in

Parvathi v. Ele Farms

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvathi v. Ele Farms

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.v.Srinivasa Chettiar Vs Mr.Sathiya Narayanan

Parvathi Vs Ele Farms

S.Maheshswari Vs K.Muthukumar

Sakthivel Vs Jeevitha

Shanmugam Vs Alagirisamy (Died)

S.Senthilkumar Vs B.Hemalatha