Prema v. Jegan Babu
Case brief
What is this about?
This revision petition challenged an order rejecting a witness recall application. The High Court set aside the lower order, permitted further cross-examination of Witness-1, and directed the trial court to conclude proceedings within 30 days.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 26.07.2018 set aside. Petitioner permitted to recall and cross-examine PW1 by 25.09.2018. Main HMOP to be completed within 30 days.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 18.09.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
C.R.P (PD) Nos.2688 & 2689 of 2018
and
CMP.Nos.15958 of 2018
Prema ..Petitioner
in both CRPs
Vs.
Jegan Babu ..Respondent
in both CRPs
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 227 of Civil Revision Petition to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 26.07.2018 made in I.A.No.67 of 2018 and 68 of 2018 in HMOP.No. 100 of 2017 on the file of the Sub Court, Ranipet.
For Petitioner : M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates (in both CRPs)
COMMON ORDER
Aggrieved against the rejection of the petitioner's
application filed under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC to reopen and recall PW1
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order rejecting the application to recall a witness for further cross-examination should be set aside to prevent prejudice to the petitioner.
Whether the main Hindu Marriage Oppression Proceedings can be concluded within a fixed time-frame after the additional cross-examination.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PREMA
- respondent
JEGAN BABU
Coram
M.S.RAMESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court