Dismissed

L. Suresh Reddy v. Krishnappa

Madras HC6 Feb 2018CRP/190/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition challenging an order rejecting an application to commit respondents to civil prison for violation of an interim possession order in an O.S. filed in the District Munsif Court, Hosur.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petition is dismissed with a direction to the District Munsif Court at Hosur to dispose of I.A.No.641 of 2014 within four months on merits with no costs.

L. Suresh Reddy Vs Krishnappa — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 06.02.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶6

Civil Revision Petition (PD) No.190 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.1074 of 2018
L.Suresh Reddy ... Petitioner/Petitioner
..Vs..
1.Krishnappa
2.Raja
3.Sujatha
4.Muthamma
5.Shilpa
6.Ramamani
7.Muthuraj
8.Annaiah@Nallappa
9.Kenchemma ... Respondents/Respondents

¶7

Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India,against the fair and decretal order dated 10.10.2017 in I.A.No.304 of 2015 in I.A.No.641 of 2014 in O.S.No.145 of 2014 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

¶8

For petitioner : Mr.R.Jayaprakash

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

Challenging the fair and decretal order dated 10.10.2017 in I.A.No.304 of 2015 in I.A.No.641 of 2014 in O.S.No.145 of 2014 on the file of

¶13

the District Munsif Court at Hosur, Krishnagiri District, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the plaintiff.

¶14

The petitioner/plaintiff has filed in I.A.No.304 of 2015 before the

¶15

Court below under Order 39 Rule 2(A) C.P.C., seeking to send the

¶16

respondents/defendants to the Civil Prison, for disobedience of the interim order

¶17

granted by the Court below.

¶18

According to the petitioner the respondents are trespassed and

¶19

interfering with petitioner's peaceful possession over the property, despite the order dated 10.10.2017. Therefore, he violates the interim order granted by the Court below, has dismissed the said application on the ground that the petitioner

¶20

has not given any particulars in person to prove that the respondents have violated the interim order passed by the court below and therefore, in view of the above fact, the petitioner has not proved by way of oral and documentary

¶21

evidence, that the respondent has violated the Court order. Therefore, this Court does not warrant to interfere with the order passed by the Court below.

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶23

¶24

However, it is open to the petitioner to file a appropriate application before the Court below, if it is necessary at a later stage.

¶25

In the light of the above said fact, this Civil Revision Petition is
dismissed with a direction, to dispose of the I.A.No.641 of 2014 in O.S.No.145 of
2014 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order on merits and in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
06.02.2018
nvi
To
The District Munsif Court at Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

¶26

http://www.judis.nic.in

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.,

nvi

Civil Revision Petition (PD) No.190 of 2018 and
C.M.P.No.1074 of 2018
06.02.2018

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in

L. Suresh Reddy v. Krishnappa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L. Suresh Reddy v. Krishnappa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narayanan Vs Vasantha

Mrs.D.Selvi Vs Mrs.S.Jeyalakshmi

Balaiyan Vs Manjini

K. Kannaki Vs K. Kalimuthu (Deceased)

R.Devadass Vs R.Govindarajan

Periya Gounder Vs S.Aruchamy