Allowed

Adrine Mariapragasam v. M.Varghese

Madras HC4 Jul 2018CRP/1392/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the Civil Revision Petition, noting that the petitioner had not been given an opportunity to be heard by the lower court. The court directed the Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Chennai, to re-hear the matter afresh within four weeks after affording both parties ample opportunity.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The Judge was directed to re-hear M.P.No.142 of 2008 afresh within four weeks.

Adrine Mariapragasam Vs M.Varghese — Property and Title | Madras HC (2018)

i m p l i

c a t i o n

o f

t h e

s e r i o u s

n a t u r e

o f

c r i m i n a l

p r

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶15

DATED : 04.07.2018

¶16

CORAM:

¶17

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶18

C.R.P.No.1392 of 2010
and
M.P.No.1 of 2010
Adrine Mariapragasam ... Petitioner
..Vs..
M.Varghese ... Respondent

¶19

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the decreetal order of the learned XIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in E.A.No.9 of 2008 in M.P.142 of 2008 in E.P.127 of 2008 in R.C.O.P.374 of 2007 dated 18.09.2009. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan For Respondent : Not ready in notice regarding sole respondent

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The above Civil Revision Petition arises out of a Common Order dated 25.08.2008 in M.P.Nos.140, 141 and 142 of 2008 in E.P.No.127 of 2008 in R.C.O.P.374 of 2007 by the learned XIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

¶22

c http://www.judis.nic.in e e d

¶23

¶24

2.The present revision relates to the order in M.P.No.142 of 2008, which has been filed for redelivery of the petition schedule property to the judgment debtor/tenant. All the three applications were allowed by this Common Order as against which, C.R.P.Nos.3226 and 3227 of 2009 and 1392 of 2010, respectively, came to be filed. C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.3226 and 3227 of 2009 have been allowed by an order of this Court dated 17.07.2017, in and by which, the following orders have been passed:

¶25

“In view of the admitted fact that no opportunity was

¶26

given to the petitioner, both the Civil Revision Petitions are allowed setting aside the order dated 25.08.2008 passed

¶27

in M.P.Nos.144 & 142 of 2008. The learned Judge is directed to re-hear M.P.Nos.144 & 142 of 2008 afresh, after giving ample opportunities to both the parties and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a

¶28

period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a

¶29

copy of this order.”

¶30

3.Considering the fact that the present revision arises out of this Common Order, the same order would enure to this revision as well.

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶32

¶33

In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The learned XIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, is directed to re-hear M.P.No.142 of 2008 afresh, after giving opportunities to both the parties within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,

¶34

connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶35

04.07.2018
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Speaking order/Non speaking order
mps
To
The XIII Judge,
Court of Small Causes,
Chennai.

¶36

http://www.judis.nic.in

P.T. ASHA J ,

mps

C.R.P.No.1392 of 2010
and
M.P.No.1 of 2010
04.07.2018

¶41

http://www.judis.nic.in

Adrine Mariapragasam v. M.Varghese

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adrine Mariapragasam v. M.Varghese

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Rm K v Silks

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S. Rr Industries Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S. G.V.G. Paper Mills Pvt.

R.Rama Prabha Vs Renganayaki Ammal

Sri Om Parasakthi Industries B Vs M/S Rajkumar Cit Funds P Ltd.

S.Robinson, S/O R.Selvamani Vs v.Sindhia, W/O S.Robinson