Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

K.Kanagambal Vs C.Krishnana — Property and Title | Madras HC (2018)

Home
Madras HC
2018
K.Kanagambal Vs C.KrishnanaK.Kanagambal v. C.Krishnana

Dismissed

K.Kanagambal v. C.Krishnana

Madras HC23 Mar 2018CRP/1097/2018

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.03.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR

CRP(PD).No.1097 of 2018
K.Kanagambal .. Petitioner
Vs
1.C.Krishnana
2.P.Ranjitham
3.G.Malarvizhi
4.E.Uma Maheshwari
5.D.Latha
6.V.Virutthambal
7.P.Vendamirtham
8.V.Mahalakshmi
9.E.Indira
10.The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Vettavalam,
Thiruvannamalai Taluk & District.
11.Sivamani .. Respondents
PRAYER
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India to issue a direction to the Learned Principal
District Judge, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District, to
expeditiously dispose of the suit in O.S.No.48 of 2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Rajan

http://www.judis.nic.in

2

O R D E R

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the Civil Revision Petition for early disposal of a suit already subject to an earlier court order requiring disposal within a fixed period deserves independent adjudication.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
K. Kanagambal
respondent
C. Krishnana
respondent
P. Ranjitham
respondent
G. Malarvizhi
respondent
E. Uma Maheshwari
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 23 Mar 2018 · March
Registered: 16 Mar 2018
Case no.: CRP/1097/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from D. Krishnakumar

Mrs.Muniamma Vs M.Krishna Reddy
22 Mar 2018
R.D. Sethuraman Vs the Secretary
22 Mar 2018
T. Pappaiah Vs Gopalappa (Died)
22 Mar 2018
N.Mohankumar Vs G.Parthasarathy
23 Mar 2018
N. Manjula Vs M. Manoj Kumar

Cite this judgement

K.Kanagambal v. C.Krishnana, CRP/1097/2018 (MAD), decided on 23 March 2018.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

D. Krishna Kumar

Parties & counsel

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the Civil Revision Petition for early disposal of a suit already subject to an earlier court order requiring disposal within a fixed period deserves independent adjudication.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

The Civil Revision Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

According to the revision petitioner, the suit in OS.No.48

of 2015 has been filed by the revision petitioner on the file of the

learned Principal District Judge, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District against the respondents herein for partition and the said suit is

pending for more than two years. Hence, the revision petitioner has

filed the present Civil Revision Petition before this Court for early disposal of the said suit.

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner would

submit that there is no interlocutory application is pending before the

trial court and hence, there is no legal impediment to dispose of the

suit. According to the revision petitioner, by order dated 11.10.2017 in CMA.No.111 of 2017, this Court has already directed the trial court to

dispose of the above suit within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of that Order.

http://www.judis.nic.in

3

Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and

perused the materials available on record.

On perusal of records, the revision petitioner has filed the

present Civil Revision Petition before this Court for early disposal of the above suit. But this Court has already directed the court below to dispose of the said suit at an earliest. At this stage, it is needless to pass

further order in the present Civil Revision Petition. It is make it clear

that the court below has to comply the direction of the earlier order dated 11.10.2017 passed by this Court in CMA.No.111 of 2017.

Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed.

In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is

dismissed with above observations. No costs.

23.03.2018

Speaking/Non-Speaking order

Index :Yes/No

Internet:Yes/No

lok

http://www.judis.nic.in

4

D. KRISHNAKUMAR J.,

lok

To
The Principal District Judge,
Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District,
CRP(PD).No.1097 of 2018

23.03.2018

http://www.judis.nic.in

D. Latha

Coram

AI extract

D. Krishna Kumar

CNR

HCMA010025842018

Topic

Property and Title

Bench

D. Krishnakumar

Disposal

DISMISSED

23 Mar 2018

Chinnathambi Maraicair @ Vs Mahadoom Ghani Maricair

23 Mar 2018