Raja Ready v. Kuppammal
Case brief
What is this about?
This order permits the petitioner to re-present a civil plaint within one week after explaining discrepancies regarding the extent and boundary of Survey No.45, deferring the numbering of the suit.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner permitted to re-present the plaint with proper explanation within one week; numbering of suit deferred.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP (PD) No. 1063 of 2017
Raja Reddy .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. Kuppammal
2. Sudhakar
3. Manickammal
4. Valli @ Amudhavalli
5. Ramu
6. Lakshmi
7. Sardar
8. Kubendiran
9. Rajendiran Reddy
10. Parveen
11. Ramesh Babu
12. Veema Reddy
13. Latha
14. Purushothaman
15. Deepa
16. Palani
17. The Sub Registrar
Gudiyattam
Having office at Gudiyattam
Vellore. ... Respondents
2
PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order of return made by the Subordinate Judge, Gudiyatham in un-numbered O.S. SR. 1372 of 2017 dated 02.03.2017, thereby directing the Subordinate Judge, Gudiyatham to take the plaint on the file and to proceed in accordance with law and pass such further orders.
For Petitioner : Mr.P. Vasanth For Respondents : Mr. Raja Ravi Varma for R7 & R8 O R D E R
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the plaint filed with discrepancies in claimed extent and boundary can be re-presented after proper explanation.
Whether the order returning the plaint was correctly made by the Subordinate Judge.
Whether the Civil Revision Petition to set aside the return order and take the plaint on file is maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raja Reddy
- respondent
Lakshmi
- respondent
Ramu
- respondent
The Sub Registrar Gudiyattam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court