Mariannan v. Raja
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition (filed under Article 226) challenging an order permitting amendment of a plaint. The Court held the amendment corrected typographical errors and did not prejudice either party, deeming the impugned order sustainable.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed; order dated 05.12.2017 confirmed; liberty granted to file additional written statement application.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.03.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP(PD)No.1037 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.5462 of 2018
Mariannan ..Petitioner
Vs.
1.Raja
2.The Superintending Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Dharmapuri.
3.The Executive Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Dharmapuri.
4.The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Dharmapuri.
5.4.The Assistant Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Dharmapuri. ..Respondents
Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 05.12.2007 passed in I.A.No.452 of 2017 in O.S.No.25 of 2015, on the file of the District Munsif and Judicisl Magistrate, Pennagaram, Dharmapuri District.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Elavarasan
2
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the District Munsif erred in permitting amendment of the plaint which changed minor typographical details without prejudice to the rights of the parties.
Whether the Civil Revision Petitioner is entitled to interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India regarding the amendment order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mariannan
- respondent
Raja
- respondent
The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Dharmapuri
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Dharmapuri
- respondent
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Dharmapuri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court