On the petitioner's counsel seeking permission to withdraw a civil revision case, the court dismissed the revision as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.09.2018
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN
CRL. REVISION CASE No.395 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
Kuppusamy ... Petitioner/Complainant Vs. K.S.Nallathambi ... Respondents/Accused Prayer: The Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to set aside the order in C.M.P.No.5359 of 2013 in C.C.No.21/2012 dated 18.12.2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court No.I, Erode by allowing the Criminal Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balaji O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Case and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
s/dAssistant Registrar(CS VIII) True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
rli
To
CRL. REVISION CASE No.395 of 2014
SP(03/10/2018)
Kuppusamy
K.S. Nallathambi
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
