The High Court dismissed a Criminal Revision Application filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 CrPC as withdrawn by the petitioner, who had sought permission during the hearing.
Criminal Revision Application dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 11.09.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.R.C.No.1135 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
R.Mukundan ...Petitioner/Accused Vs. Thiagarajan ...Respondent/Complainant Prayer: This Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against order dated 07.10.2014 made in Cr.M.P.No.3368 of 2014 in C.C.No.2692 of 2014 on the file of the Fast Track Court IV, George Town, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.T.R.Ravi For Respondent: O R D E R
When the criminal revision is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal revision and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2 Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement, this criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
cgi
To The Fast Track Court IV, George Town, Chennai.
Crl.R.C.No.1135 of 2014 and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
gj ii[co]
srg 10/10/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Mukundan
Thiagarajan
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
