Allowed

Balamurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Jun 2018CRL OP(MD)/9387/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was the sixth accused in a case involving offences under various sections of the IPC. The court imposed conditions including execution of a bond with sureties and appearance for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail subject to execution of bond with sureties and other conditions.

Balamurugan Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Eleventh day of June Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.9387 of 2018

¶6

BALAMURUGAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.6

¶7

¶8

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAVAYAL POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.25 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.MUNIYANDI, Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner is accused No.6. He was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.04.2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 307 of IPC @ 147,148,341,294(b), 323,324,307 and 302 IPC in Crime No. 25 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police. He seeks bail.

¶14

2.The petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2018 for offence under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 307 of IPC @ 147,148,341,294(b),323,324,307 and 302 IPC. The petitioner's name does not figure in the First Information Report. This Court had already granted bail to some of the co-accused.

¶15

3.Taking note of the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions;

¶16

(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai, Sivagangai District;

¶17

(ii)the petitioner is directed to appear before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent as and when required for interrogation;

¶18

(iii) The petitioner shall not abscond;

¶19

(iv)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

¶20

sd/11/06/2018

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶23

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶24

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶25

THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶26

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAVAYAL POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶27

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to Mr.S.MUNIYANDI Advocate SR.No.10019

¶28

ORDER IN

¶29

CRL OP(MD) No.9387 of 2018 Date :11/06/2018 MS/PN/ASVM/11.06.2018/2P.7C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Balamurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balamurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayamani Vs the Inspector of Police

A.C.Murugesan Vs the Inspector of Police

Malaiselvam @ Selvam Vs the Superintendent of Customs

Resilammal Vs the Deputy Inspector General

M/S.Alfred Berfs @ Co. (I) Pvt. Vs the Drugs Inspector

Gopi Vs the Inspector of Police