further submitted that one Mr.M.Senthilkumar, Sub-Inspector of Police, Navalpattu Police Station enquired with the said Kaliammal about the involvement of her car in the road accident that took place on 01.09.2017 at about 10.00 p.m. Even though the said Kaliammal stoutly denied the involvement of her car in the said accident, the said Sub-Inspector of Police has forcibly took the said car from the petitioner's house on 06.11.2017 at about 2.00 a.m., Hence, the said Kaliammal has filed a petition in Crl.OP.(MD) No.15549 of 2017 seeking for the release of the said car. This Court, by its order dated 15.11.2017, directed the first respondent to submit a report. Accordingly, the first respondent has filed a report stating that the said car has been involved in Cr.No.221 of 2017 u/s.304 (A) IPC on the file of the second respondent. This Court passed an order on 05.12.2017 directing the second respondent to return the said car to the said Kaliammal after producing the same before concerned RTO and as per the order of this Court, the second respondent after producing the vehicle before the RTO returned the said vehicle to the said Kaliammal. Hence, the said Crl.OP.(MD)No.15549 of 2017 was disposed on 12.12.2017. He further submitted that the aforesaid vehicle was not at all involved in the accident. But with a view to help the victim of the deceased for getting compensation, the second respondent has falsely implicated the aforesaid vehicle and also the petitioner herein as he was driving the said vehicle at the relevant time. He further submitted that the second respondent has not investigated the matter in an unbiased manner and hence, the investigation may be transferred to the third respondent or any other competent agency for fair and unbiased investigation.
