Dismissed

K.Baskaran v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC26 Jul 2018CRL OP(MD)/13819/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking directions against police harassment. The court recorded counsel's submission that no harassment occurred and did not proceed with directions.

What did the court decide?

Directions to police officers to not harass the petitioner were declined as the court recorded a submission that no harassment existed.

K.Baskaran Vs the Superintendent of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

K.Baskaran

¶3

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.07.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.13819 of 2017

¶7

.. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

¶10

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, Vadamadurai,

¶12

Dindigul District.

¶13

The Sub Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station,

¶14

Dindigul District. .. Respondents

¶15

Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents and his subordinates not to harass the Petitioner.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Manimaran

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents 3 and 4 and his subordinates not to harass the Petitioner.

¶20

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that there is no harassment at the hands of the respondents 3 and 4.

¶21

3.Recording the abovesaid submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶24

/True Copy/

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶27

¶28

¶29

1.	The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.
2.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.
3.	The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, Vadamadurai, Dindigul District.
4.	The Sub Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, Dindigul District.
5.	The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
MJ
VB/	KAK/SAR3/16.08.2018/2P/6C
	CRL.O.P.(MD) No.13819 of 2017 26.07.2018

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Baskaran v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Baskaran v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C. Malaisamy Vs the Superintendent of Police

T.Anbalagan Vs the Commissioner of Police

K.Lakshmanaraja Vs the Inspector of Police

Venkateswaran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Sabbani Muthu Thevar Vs the Superintendent of Police

Shankaralinga Harshavarthan Vs the Commissioner of Police