Dismissed

K.T.Ramakrishnan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Feb 2018CRL OP(MD)/11968/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought withdrawal and transfer of a Sessions case via an unrepresented Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 407 CrPC. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to absence of representation on both hearing dates.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

K.T.Ramakrishnan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 07.02.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.11968 of 2015 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2015

¶7

1.K.T.Ramakrishnan 2.K.Ramesh ... Petitioners/Accused

¶8

-vs-

¶9

State Represented by The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Thanjavur. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 407 of Criminal Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer the Sessions case in S.C.No.292 of 2015 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge / Additional Sub Judge, Thanjavur to any other Court of Competent Jurisdiction in Trichy District Division or any other District Division nearby to try the same.

¶11

For Petitioners : No appearance

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners, to withdraw and transfer the Sessions case in S.C.No.292 of 2015 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge/Additional Sub Judge, Thanjavur to any other Court of Competent Jurisdiction in Trichy District Division or any other District Division nearby to try the same.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

¶17

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing on 02.02.2018, no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was posted under the caption “for dismissal” today (07.02.2018), even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(P&J)

¶19

/True Copy/

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

¶22

The Assistant Sessions Judge/ Additional Sub Judge, Thanjavur. 2. The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Thanjavur. 3. Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶23

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.11968 of 2015 07.02.2018

¶24

PK/JC/SAR-1/26.02.2018 : 2P/4C

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.T.Ramakrishnan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.T.Ramakrishnan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Angeline Percy Sylome Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

S.Velaventhan Vs the Inspector of Police

Faizal Hussian@ Sahib Faizal Vs the Inspector of Police

Paribak Vs the Superintendent of Police

Caroline Getsy Vs the Inspector of Police

N. Raja Vs the Superintendent of Police