This court rejected the petition on withdrawal. The counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Criminal Original Petition filed to quash an FIR, citing an amicable settlement, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Thilaga
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.10.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11579 of 2017
...Petitioner/A2
Vs.
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.737 of 2017 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned as the matter is amicably settled between the parties.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Karuppasamy For Respondent No.1: Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Respondet No.2 : Mr.R.Gandhi
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
2
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Theni Police Station, Theni District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
AAV BU/SKN/SAR-III :23.11.2018 : 2P/3C
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11579 of 2017 09.10.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thilaga
Inspector of Police Theni Police Station Theni District
Rajkumar
N. Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
