3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the 1st petitioner is the wife of the 2nd petitioner and the 2nd petitioner is the Practicing Advocate, Senior citizen appears in various Courts. The 2nd petitioner had appeared in the suit filed by the 1st accused one Govindan owner of the property filed a suit in O.S.No.1039 of 1996 and had obtained permanent injunction in the suit property for his peaceful possession and enjoyment. Further, it is admitted that, the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant is running a fast food biryani shop at a small portion belonging to the 1st accused Govindan. There is Civil dispute between them and taking advantage of the advanced age of the owner of the property, the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant had given the false complaint to usurp his property, created trouble without paying rent to the said Govindan, for which the 2nd petitioner representing the said Govindan had filed eviction suit in O.S.No.79 of 2006 before the learned District Munsif, Alandur. The learned District Munsif, Alandur by judgment dated 12.03.2007 had ordered eviction of the 2nd respondent and decreed the suit in favour of the said Govindan.
