Dismissed

Marie Stella Rene, M/a 46 Yrs, v. the Union Territory of

Madras HC14 Mar 2018CRL OP/7709/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, convicted and in appeal, moved under Section 482 CrPC to get her passport returned to travel abroad to visit her children. The Court refused, citing the risk of absconding and the foreign nationality, directing the appellate court to dispose of the pending appeal by April 30, 2018.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; petitioner directed to approach the Appellate Court and passport retained as security against absconding.

Marie Stella Rene, M/a 46 Yrs, Vs the Union… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 14.03.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.7709 of 2018

Marie Stella Rane

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Union Territory of Puducherry Represented by the Inspector of Police Central Bureau of Investigation, Special Crime Branch, 'A' Wing, 3^rd Floor, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai-600 090.

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate to return the petitioner's passport bearing No.07CR78885, permit her to renew the same and travel abroad to visit her children at France pending disposal of the Crl.A.No.18 of 2017 on the file of the II Additional District Sessions Judge at Puducherry.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.C. Arunkumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This Criminal Original petition is filed for seeking direction of this Court to return the petitioner's passport for her to travel abroad to meet her children at France.

¶15

2 The facts of the case is that one of the accused Dhanush @ Dhanassou (A1) impersonated himself as B.Charles, furnished fake documents for obtaining passport and also fabricated fake birth certificate as if issued by the Revenue authorities and mentioned his parents name as J.Baskar and Marie Stella Rene. Thus, the petitioner herein as biological parents and the petitioner has facilitated one Dhanush @ B.Charles for getting French passport.

¶16

3 The Trial Court has found the petitioner guilty and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ convicted to undergo Rigorous imprisonment for one year for

¶17

various offences and the period of sentence to run concurrently.

¶18

4 Aggrieved by that, the petitioner has preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.18 of 2017 and the same is pending on the file of the II Additional District Sessions Judge, Puducherry. In the said circumstances, the petitioner by filing the present petition before this Court, seek return of her passport to travel abroad.

¶19

5 This Court finds no reason to entertain the petition, she being a Foreign National, the passport if returned will enable the petitioner/appellant to abscond. Therefore, the Appellate Court is directed to complete the hearing of arguments on the appeal and dispose the appeal in Crl.A.No.18 of 2017 on merits on or before 30.04.2018. With this direction, this Criminal Original petition stands disposed of.

¶20

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rpl
To
1 The Inspector of Police,
The Union Territory of Puducherry,
Central Bureau of Investigation,
Special Crime Branch,
'A' Wing, 3 rd Floor,
Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar,
Chennai-600 090.
2 The II Additional District sessions judge Puducherry.
3 The Principal District sessions judge Puducherry.
4 The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
copy to
The Chief Judicial Magistrate,Puducherry
+1cc to Mr.Arunkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.19319

¶21

Crl.O.P.No.7709 of 2018

¶22

CO) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ GSP(03/04/2018)

Marie Stella Rene, M/a 46 Yrs, v. the Union Territory of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Marie Stella Rene, M/a 46 Yrs, v. the Union Territory of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Viswanathan Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Chandira, M.E.,(M.B.a) (Bgl) Vs the Inspector of Police

Chennai Airport Prepaid Vs the Director

The State by Its Vs Tr.E.Hariharane

Mohammed Ziaudin Vs State Cbcid

G.Elumalai, M/46 Vs the Inspector of Police