The High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash an FIR as infructuous. The Court accepted that investigation was completed and a charge sheet filed, making the petition premature.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :01.10.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
Crl.OP.No. 7274 of 2013
and MP.No.1 of 2013
K.Shanmugasundaram ... Petitioner Vs. State by 1. The Inspector of Police, Kangayam Police Station, Kangayam, Tiruppur District. (Cr.No.50 of 2013) 2. Nivetha ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the entire records concerned in Cr.No.50 of 2013 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Kangayam Police Station, Kangayam, Tiruppur District and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.T.Shunmuga Rajeswaran for R1 ORDER
This petition has been filed by the accused No.5 to quash the FIR in Crime No.50 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vv/vsn
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate,
Kangayam
2. The Inspector of Police,
Kangayam Police Station,
Kangayam, Tiruppur District.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.C.Prakasam, Advocate Sr.68236
Crl.OP.No.7274 of 2013
and
MP.No.1 of 2013
gp[co]
srg 02/11/2018
K. Shanmugasundaram
State
Nivetha
P. RAJAMANICKAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
