Allowed

Mr.Shabeer Ahemed, v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC1 Mar 2018CRL OP/4187/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Judicature at Madras quashed criminal proceedings initiated under Crime No.253 of 2017 following an amicable compromise between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, recorded via affidavit and personal appearance. The Criminal Original Petition seeking quash under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was allowed.

What did the court decide?

The proceedings in Crime No.253 of 2017, FIR, and connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition were quashed and closed following a recorded compromise.

Mr.Shabeer Ahemed, Vs the State Rep by Its — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.03.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.4187 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.1927 of 2018

¶6

Shabeer Ahemed ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State Represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Vellore North Police Station,
Vellore.
2.Sowkath Ali ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482
Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records and quash the impugned
FIR as against the petitioner in Crime No.253 of 2017 on the
file of the Vellore North Police Station, Vellore District.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abdul Basith
For R1 : Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal
Government Advocate [Crl.Side]
For R2 : Mr.K.Nizamuddin

¶7

ORDER

¶8

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.253 of 2017 on the file of the The Inspector of Police, Vellore North Police Station, Vellore.

¶9

2.Pending Criminal Original Petition, the defacto complainant and the petitioner has amicably resolved the dispute among themselves and accordingly, they have entered into a compromise.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

Today, the defacto complainant and the petitioner is personally present before this Court and they have been identified by their counsel on record. The counsel for the parties have submitted the photo copies of the parties in respect of their Identity Cards viz., Shabeer Ahemed Hadhi Basha– Aadhar No.860065323608 and Shoukath Ali Mohammed Sheriff – Aadhar No.343281363755 and after verification of the original cards, the same were also recorded.

¶12

The defacto complainant has also filed an affidavit, dated 01.03.2018 before this Court to the effect that he has no objection, if the present Criminal Original Petition is allowed.

¶13

In view of the above submissions made on either side and taking into account, the compromise entered into between the parties, the proceedings in Crime No.253 of 2017 on the file of the The Inspector of Police, Vellore North Police Station, Vellore, is hereby quashed.

¶14

The affidavit, dated 01.03.2018 filed by the defacto
complainant/Sowkath Ali, is hereby recorded and shall form part
of the order. The Criminal Original Petition is allowed.
Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dna
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
Vellore North Police Station,
Vellore
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.I.AbdulBasith, Advocate, S.R.No.16072

¶15

Crl.O.P.No.4187 of 2018 RRK(09/03/2018)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mr.Shabeer Ahemed, v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Shabeer Ahemed, v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanam, F/a 52 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.Cognizant Technology Vs the Inspector of Police

E.Dhamodharan, Aged 36 Years, Vs State Rep. by

R.Srinivasan, Vs the State Rep by Its

Mrs.Sundari, Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Uma F/34, Vs the Superintendent of Police