Dismissed

Neela v. State by Its

Madras HC22 Nov 2018CRL OP/27013/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to direct police registration of a case. The court held the petition was not maintainable in view of a recent Division Bench judgment granting liberty to work out remedies under those guidelines. The petition was disposed of with liberty granted.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to work out remedy under Division Bench guidelines; petition disposed.

Neela Vs State by Its — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :22.11.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.27013 of 2018

¶6

Neela

¶7

...Petitioner/Complainant

¶8

Vs.

¶9

State rep.by its The Commissioner of Police, Chennai Police Commissioner's Office Campus, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

¶10

State rep.by its The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tambaram, Chennai-600 045. 3. The Inspector of Police, S3-Chromepet Police Station, Chennai-600 044. ...Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents to register the petitioner's complaint dated 20.08.2018.

¶11

For Petitioner :Mr.A.Nagaraj

¶12

For Respondents :Mr.C.Raghavan Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents Police to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 20.08.2018.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

¶16

3.In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13681 of 2018 and batch of cases, dated 20.09.2018, the petition of this nature is not maintainable before this Court. Liberty is granted to the

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

petitioner to work out his remedy in accordance with the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Division Bench in the decision referred supra.

¶19

4.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is petition is disposed of.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar
rpl
To
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Chennai Police Commissioner's Office Campus,
Vepery, Chennai-600 007.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.
3. The Inspector of Police,
S3-Chromepet Police Station,
Chennai-600 044.
4. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.A.Nagaraju, Advocate in sr.no.80024

¶24

Crl.O.P.No.27013 of 2018 CA(CO) CS/26/12/2018

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Neela v. State by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neela v. State by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anandan Duraisamy, Vs Nithya Periyasamy

R.Mathialagan Vs a.S.Ramasamy

M.S.Ashokan, Aged 53 Years Vs the Inspector of Police

John Surgen Vs the State Rep by Its

V.Palraj Vs the Superintendent of Police

P.Senthilkumar Vs M.P.Murugavel