The court dismissed the criminal original petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as the petitioners sought and obtained permission to withdraw them, resulting in the closure of connected petitions.
Permission to withdraw petitions granted; petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.Nos.238 & 810 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos.163,164/2017 & 9715 of 2018, and 589,590 of 2017
Janani
...Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.238 of 2017
1.A.Prabhuram
2.S.Anandan
3.A.Lakshmirajam
...Petitioners in Crl.O.P.No. 810 of 2017
Vs.
S.Pavithra
...Sole Respondent in Crl.Op.238/17
1 st Respondent in Crl.Op.810/17
2.Minor.Adhira rep by her Mother
and Guardian
S.Pavithra
...2 nd Respondent in Crl.O.P.No.810 of 2017
Common Prayer in Both Crl.O.Ps: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the complaint bearing D.V.No.54 of 2016 on the file of Honourable Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram along with connected papers and quash the same in Petitioner's concern.
For Petitioners in both Crl.O.Ps : Mr.V.Manoharan
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed. No Costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mpa/rpl
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate,
Tambaram.
2.do Thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Chengalpet.
Crl.O.P.Nos.238 & 810 of 2017
and Crl.M.P.Nos.163,164/2017, 9715 of 2018,
and 589,590 of 2017
vd(co)
nr 10/01/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Janani
S. Anandan
S. Pavithra
N. Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
