Disposed

T.Jayakumar, Age 53 v. State Rep by

Madras HC23 Apr 2018CRL OP/11903/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal original petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the court observed that over a year had lapsed without a final report and the investigating officer had sought sanction. The court directed the IO to expedite sanction and file the final report on or before 30.06.2018.

What did the court decide?

Ordered the Investigating Officer to expedite sanction and file the final report on or before 30.06.2018.

T.Jayakumar, Age 53 Vs State Rep by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 23.04.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.11903 of 2018

¶7

T.Jayakumar ... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai city, Unit-V, Chennai ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent to file a Final report in Crime No.01/AC/2017/CC-V on the file of respondent police within a time frame.

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner who is representing one

¶11

of the accused, viz.,A-2, and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶12

2 The petition is to direct the respondent to file Final Report in Crime No.01/AC/2017/CC-V, which case was registered based on the complaint dated 08.03.2017.

¶13

3 It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that

¶14

more than a year lapsed and so far the final report has not yet been filed, which caused great inconvenience to the petitioner, since he is placed

¶15

http://www.judis.nic.in under suspension.

¶16

¶17

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

¶18

Rpl

¶19

4 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the

¶20

investigation is completed and the Investigating Officer has sought sanction

¶21

to prosecute the accused persons and awaiting sanction order from the

¶22

respective authorities.

¶23

5 Taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel for the

¶24

petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, it is suffice to direct the Investigating Officer to expedite the process of sanction to

¶25

prosecute the accused persons and to file the final report on or before 30.06.2018.

¶26

6 In the result, the petition is disposed of with the above

¶27

direction.

¶28

23.04.2018

¶29

Internet : Yes rpl To

¶30

1 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai city, Unit-V, Chennai

¶31

2 The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.11903 of 2018

¶33

http://www.judis.nic.in

T.Jayakumar, Age 53 v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Jayakumar, Age 53 v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Nandakumar, Male Aged Vs the Superintendent of Police

T.L.Prabhakaran, Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

M/S.Stepstone Promoters Pvt. Vs the Inspector of Police

M.H.Ansari Vs State by

R.Dorairaj, M/a 64 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

Sarumathi, 58 Yeas, Vs the State Rep by Its