5.According to the 1st petitioner, he borrowed a sum of Rs.3 lakhs from one Neelakandan during the years 2002 and 2003 and at that time the said Neelakandan has obtained the signatures in blank Promissory notes and also obtained singed blank cheques and subsequently in the year 2005, he has repaid the said loan with interest and made request to return those documents. But the said Neelakandan has not returned those documents relating to the Centurion Bank Limited, Chennai. He further states that he has lodged a complaint against the said Neelakandan before the police and during the enquiry on the said complaint, the said Neelakandan, admitted all the facts and hence the 1st petitioner is not liable to pay out any amount. It is their further case that in the complaint the respondent has started that 8 cheques relating to the Centurion Bank Limited, Chennai were issued by the petitioners herein in the year 2012 whereas, the said Centurion Bank Limited, Chennai itself was closed in the year 2005 itself and the aforesaid facts itself would show that no transactions could have been taken place in the year 2012.
