The High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash domestic violence proceedings as infructuous because the petitioners counsel had endorsed that the prayer was no longer required. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
No costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 23.10.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
CRL.O.P.No.10692 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013
1.G.Rajesh 2.Gunasekaran 3.Indirani 4.Ramamurthy ...Petitioners / Accused Vs. Rathipria @ Saranya ...Respondent /Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records and quash the proceedings in M.C.No.22 of 2012 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, on the file fo the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Perundurai.
For Petitioners :M/s.N.U.Prasanna for
M/s.Sai Bharath and Ilan
For Respondent :No appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayer sought for in this criminal original petition has become infructuous and he has made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(co)
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to M/s.Sai Bharath and Ilan , Advocate SR.No.72493
CRL.O.P.No.10692 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013
ASK(06/12/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Rajesh
Gunasekaran
Indirani
Rathipria @ Saranya
P. Rajamanickam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
