Remanded

Sakthivel v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC14 Nov 2018CRL OP/10127/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners sought quashing of a criminal case due to lack of a final report. The court heard submissions from the petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor. Noting that the investigation was completed per the prosecutor, the court directed the police to file a final or closure report before the competent Judicial Magist

What did the court decide?

Director police to file a final report or closure report before the concerned Judicial Magistrate Court at Perambalur.

Sakthivel Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.11.2018

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶4

Crl.O.P.No.10127 of 2014

¶5

and

¶6

Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2014

¶7

1.Sakthivel
2.Kumaravel
3.Pushpam
4.Parvathy
5.Ramar ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Perambalur.
2.Selvaraj ..Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Crime No.04 of 2014 on the file the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Perambalur and to quash the same.

¶9

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Milton Arul Rajendran
For R1 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R

¶10

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to file a final report in Crime No.04 of 2014.

¶11

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent.

¶12

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the respondent has registered a case in the above said crime number on 22.03.2014, no final report is filed till date.

¶13

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent submitted that investigation was completed and charge sheet will be filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate (Land Grabbing cases), Perambalur.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

5.In view of the above, the respondent police is directed to file a final report or closure report, as the case may be before the concerned Judicial Magistrate Court at Perambalur in accordance with law.

¶16

6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶19

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rpl/msrm
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Perambalur.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.R.Rajamani, Advocate, S.R.No.78520
Crl.O.P.No.10127 of 2014
RK(CO)
rrs 11/12/2018

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sakthivel v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sakthivel v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Raja, Aged About 53 Years Vs the Inspector of Police

Mr.M.Sundaralingam Vs Mr.Ramasamy

M.Selvam @ Aatti Selvam Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Tamilarasi Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Sakthivel, Aged 35 Years, Vs Tmt.Jeevitha

Parimala, F/A.31 Years Vs State Rep by