An appeal was filed by a defacto complainant seeking to intervene in an existing main case regarding anticipatory bail. The court noted the main settlement between parties and ordered the closure of the pending intervention petition.
The intervening petition is closed as the underlying matter has been settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Saturday, the Eleventh day of August Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU
CRL MP(MD) No.8478 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.17035 of 2016
AHAMED MEERAL ... PETITIONER/INTERVENER
Vs
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
AL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AMBASAMUDRAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT ...1st RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to permit her to intervene in the main case in Crl.O.P.(MD). No.17035/2016 and dismiss the same as devoid of merits.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.S.THESIGAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.R.ANANDRAJ, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)for the Respondents the court made the following order:-
This petition has been filed by the defacto complainant praying to intervene in the anticipatory bail petition filed by the respondents 2 to 6 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.17035 of 2016.
2.This Court had granted anticipatory bail to the respondents Crl.O.P.(MD).No.17035 of 2016, vide order dated 26.10.2016 and subsequently, the petitioner herein has filed Crl.M.P.(MD).No.11999 of 2016 seeking to cancel the anticipatory bail order, dated 26.10.2016. Since the parties have filed a compromise memo stating that the matter has been settled between them on terms, the said petition was closed on 15.06.2017 recording the settlement. But, it https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ was not brought to the notice of this Court about the pendency of the intervening application and therefore, the intervening
2
application was not closed and it is still pending unnecessarily. Hence, this petition is listed today.
sd/-
11/08/2018
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
PS/VR/SAR-2:27/08/2018:2P/3C
ORDER
IN CRL MP(MD) No.8478 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.17035 of 2016 Date :11/08/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit an intervenor in a main anticipatory bail matter and dispose of the intervention petition.
AHAMED MEERAL
KAJA MAIDEEN
SHEIK MYDEEN
MUTHU MEERAL
NAGOORAL BEEVI 6 KOTHAR
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AMBASAMUDRAM
J. NISHA BANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
