Partly allowed

V. Nagaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/1467/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail matter, the Madras High Court relaxed the conditions of bail previously imposed on the petitioner. The court modified the requirement so the petitioner must appear before the police once a week on Mondays instead of the previous frequency.

What did the court decide?

Condition of bail modified to require the petitioner to appear before police once a week on Mondays at 10:30 AM.

V. Nagaraj Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Ninth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.1467 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.1540 of 2018

¶6

V. NAGARAJ ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2

¶7

STATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VILATHIKULAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. IN CR.NO. 07/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP.NO. 1450/2018 dated 01.02.2018 on the file of the Respondent Police

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.KA.RAAMAKRISHINAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶10

This Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 1540 of 2018, dated 01.02.2018.

¶11

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶12

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner herein is complying with the condition regularly, without any deviation and he further submitted that the charge sheet is not yet filed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 1540 of 2018, dated 01.02.2018 is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week i.e. on every Monday at 10.30 am until further orders.

¶14

/ TRUE COPY /

¶15

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶16

¶17

THE JUDGE, MAHILA COURT, THOOTHUKUDI.

¶18

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VILATHIKULAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

¶19

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶20

GJM/RR/CSL/SAR-2-19.3.18-2P-4C

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V. Nagaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Nagaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh @ Ramesh Pandi Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramesh @ Ramesh Pandi, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ammasi @ Sekar Vs the Inspector of Police

Karthickumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ganesan Vs the Inspector of Police

M.S.Pandi Vs the Inspector of Police