Allowed

S.Ramesh, Aged 51 Years, v. State Rep. by:

Madras HC3 Jul 2018CRL MP/8187/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In criminal miscellaneous petition No.8187 of 2018, the Madras High Court, on hearing arguments from parties and noting the petitioner's compliant conduct, relaxed the condition imposing mandatory monthly reporting to the Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai.

What did the court decide?

Relaxation of the condition to report before the trial court on the first working day of every alternative month at 10.30 a.m. starting from 01.09.2018.

S.Ramesh, Aged 51 Years, Vs State Rep. by: — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Third day of July Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.8187 of 2018

¶7

IN CRL A.102/2013

¶8

S.RAMESH [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

¶10

STATE REP. BY: [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SPE, CBI,EOW, CHENNAI. R.C. NO. 4E/2007/CBI/EOW/CHENNAI.

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition petitioner/accused shall report before the Learned Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai on the first working day of every alternative month at 10.30 a.m. until further orders imposed by this Honble Court in Crl.M.P.No. 1 of 2013 in Crl.A.No. 102 of 2013 order dated 8.2.2013 against C.C.No. 27 of 2008.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.G.SANTHOSHKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SRINIVASAN, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CBI CASES on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

Seeking to relax the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2013 in Crl.A.No.102 of 2013 dated 08.02.2013, the petitioner is before this Court with this miscellaneous petition.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Public Prosecutor.

¶15

From the typed set of papers furnished before this Court, it appears that the petitioner is complying with the condition without fail.

¶16

Considering the conduct and the nature of the offence, the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2013 in

¶17

Crl.A.No.102 of 2013 dated 08.02.2013 is relaxed and the petition is ordered accordingly. The petitioner shall report before the trial Court on the first working day of every alternative month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders starting from 01.09.2018.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

03/07/2018

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE SPECIAL COURT FOR CBI CASES, CHENNAI.

¶25

2 THE XI ADDITIIONAL SPECIAL JUDGE, [CBI CASES RELATING TO BANK AND

¶26

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS], CHENNAI.

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SPE, CBI,EOW, CHENNAI. R.C. NO. 4E/2007/CBI/EOW/CHENNAI.

¶28

4 THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CBI CASES, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

C.C. to M/S.P.G.SANTHOSHKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

CRL MP.8187/2018

CRL A.102/2013

Date :03/07/2018

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format MLT-06/07/2018

S.Ramesh, Aged 51 Years, v. State Rep. by:

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Ramesh, Aged 51 Years, v. State Rep. by:

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.a.Shajahan, M/A-68 Yrs Vs State by

P.K.Chandrasekaran Vs the Inspector of Police

V.M.Mariappan, Aged 60 Years Vs Deputy Superintendnet of

M.Narayanasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Murugesan, Aged 46 Yrs, Vs the State Rep by Its

M/S.Stepstone Promototers Vs the Inspector of Police