Dismissed
Kalaivanan Alias Pandidhurai v. State Rep by
Madras HCCRL A/95/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.06.2018 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Crl.A.No.95 of 2011 And M.P.No.1 of 2011
Kalaivanan alias Pandidhurai alias Pandi.. Appellant/Accused No.2
Vs.
State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thiruppur Rural Police Station, Thiruppur District. (Crime No.740/2008) .. Respondent/Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the conviction and sentence passed in S.C.No.86 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, and Fast Track Court No.4, Thiruppur, by judgment dated 07.09.2010.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Sumithra Vasudevan For Respondent : Ms.T.P.Savitha
Government Advocate
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant is not pressing this criminal appeal and hence the criminal appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
and Fast Track Court No.4, Thiruppur.
Thiruppur District. (Crime No.740/2008)
3.The Judicial Magistrate No.2 Thiruppur
4.The Superintendent Central Prison Coimbatore
copy to
The Section Officer(Records) Criminal Section High Court, Madras
Crl.A.No.95 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
ppa(co) aa25/06/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kalaivanan alias Pandidhurai alias Pandi
State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thiruppur Rural Police Station, Thiruppur District
R.Pongiappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court