Dismissed

K.v.Suresh v. State Rep.by

Madras HC5 Apr 2018CRL A/478/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed criminal appeals by a bank Branch Manager and another accused, confirming their conviction for criminal conspiracy, cheating, and corruption. The Court held evidence proved a fraudulent withdrawal of funds via internal debit slips without the account holder's consent.

What did the court decide?

Macinnis Appeals dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed; periods of sentence ordered to run concurrently.

K.v.Suresh Vs State Rep.by — Corruption | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

RESERVED ON

¶4

:13.03.2018

¶5

PRONOUNCED ON :05.4.2018

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶8

Criminal Appeal Nos.478 and 489 of 2006

¶9

K.V.Suresh .. Appellant in
Crl.A.No.478 of 2006
N.Robin .. Appellant in
Crl.A.No.489 of 2006
/versus/
State represented by the
Inspector of Police,
SPE/CBI/ACB/Chennai,
(R.C.No.42(A)/1999) ..Respondent in both Cases

¶10

Common Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C.,to allow the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence made in C.C.No.13 of 2003 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, C.B.I.Cases, Coimbatore dated 05.05.2006.

¶11

For Appellant :Mr.V.Gopinath, Sr.C.for Mr.M.Balasubramanian in Crl.A.No.478 of 2006 Mr.S.Ashokkumar, Sr.C for Mr.K.B.Arul in Crl.A.No.489 of 2006

¶12

For Respondent :Mr.K.Srinivasan, Spl.P.P. For CBI cases -----------

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Mrs.Premalatha Paul, Vs the State Rep by Its

Devendran Vs Vanju Gandhi

Rajagopalan Vs the Deputy Superintendent

The State Rep by Its, Vs M.Raju, M/a 38 Years

Ranjith Kothari, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ranjith Kothari Vs the Inspector of Police