Chandreeswaran v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed under Section 374(2) CrPC as abated because the appellant had died on 27.01.2011, supported by a death certificate.
What did the court decide?
The criminal appeal was dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 14.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Criminal Appeal No.219 of 2010
Chandresswaran @ Chandra Eswaran @ Chandran S/o.Arumugam ...Appellant
Versus
The State The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Coimbatore District. Crime No. 700 of 2008 ...Respondent
Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, against the judgment dated 18.09.2009 made in S.C.No.54 of 2009 on the file of the First Additional District and Sessions Judge at Coimbatore and praying to set aside the same.
For Appellant : Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan
For Respondent : Mr.G.Ramar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chandresswaran @ Chandra Eswaran @ Chandran S/o. Arumugam
- respondent
The State The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Coimbatore District.
Coram
R. Pongiappan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court