Contempt petition seeking punishment for non-compliance of a previous order. Court found the respondent had complied; petition closed with liberty to approach court again.
Contempt petition closed; liberty granted to pursue remedy in appropriate manner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.12.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Contempt Petition No.997 of 2017
B.Subhan Sherif ...Petitioner vs.
Mr.Lalit Kumar Chauhan, The Regional Manager (LPG Operations) Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Tamil Nadu State Office, Indian Oil Bhavan, No.139, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. ...Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for non-compliance of the order of this Court made in W.P.No.38692 of 2016 dated 07.11.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.U.Devasenathipathi
for M/s.Nathan and Associates
For Respondent : Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali
2
O R D E R
This Contempt Petition is filed complaining that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.38692/2016 dated 07.11.2016 has not been complied with.
3
petitioner to work out his remedy in a manner known to law.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
vsi
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
PS/12/12/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Subhan Sherif
Mr.Lalit Kumar Chauhan
K Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
