Dismissed

Nellai-Thoothukudi Nadar v. Mr.a.K.Viswanthan

Madras HC14 Aug 2018CONT P/968/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner sought punishment for respondents' alleged disobedience of a prior order. The court recorded the government counsel's submission regarding case registration and closed the petition without adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition stands closed.

Nellai-Thoothukudi Nadar Vs Mr.a.K.Viswanthan — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶3

Dated: 14.08.2018

¶4

Coram:

¶5

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH

¶6

Contp.No.968 of 2018

¶7

Nellai-Thoothukudi Nadar Magamai Paripalana Sangam, Having office at No.22, Old No.488, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. rep. by its President Mr.V.T.Pathmanaban Nadar .. Petitioner Vs.

¶8

1.A.K.Viswanathan,

¶9

The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

¶10

2.R.Senthil Kumar,

¶11

The Inspector of Police-Crimes, F-2, Egmore Police Station, Chennai-600 008.

¶12

3.R.Sumathi, The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, EDF-II, Team IX A, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

¶13

.. Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Respondents herein for their act of deliberate, wilful and wanton disobedience of the order of this Court dated 02.11.2017 made in Crl.O.P.No.23341 of 2017.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sundar Rajan For Respondents : Mr.B.Arulmozhimaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

Heard Mr.Mr.T.Sundar Rajan, learned counsel for the

¶19

petitioner and Mr.B.Arulmozhimaran, learned Government

¶20

Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents.

¶21

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that based on the petitioner's complaint dated 11.10.2017, a case has been registered in FIR No.345 of 2018 on 13.08.2018.

¶22

3.Recording the submission made by the learned

¶23

Government Advocate (Crl. Side), the Contempt Petition stands closed.

¶24

SD/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(Comm.Cases)

¶25

//Certified to be true copy//

¶26

Dated at Madras this the day of 2018.

¶27

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶28

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶29

CO/12/10/2018

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

¶32

¶33

1.The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Inspector of Police-Crimes, F-2, Egmore Police Station, Chennai-600 008. 3.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, EDF-II, Team IX A, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Nellai-Thoothukudi Nadar v. Mr.a.K.Viswanthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nellai-Thoothukudi Nadar v. Mr.a.K.Viswanthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayalakshmi (Deceased), Vs Rajalakshmi

Mr. S. Sanjeevi Vs Saravanan

B. Magesh Vs Mr. Shankar Singh

Emily Lawrence Vs Mr.Perundurai Murugan

M.K.Velu Vs Mr.Murugesan

N.Sreenivasa Reddy Vs Raja Reddy