Petitioners challenged compliance of a 2014 order via contempt. Court held compliance was established, ordered contempt petition closed without costs, and no further adjudication required.
Contempt petition closed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.01.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.951 of 2015
1.Jayapaul
2.J.Annammal
3.Roche Martian John
4.J.Ronald
5.J.Jayasingh
[Petitioners 2 to 5(legal heirs) are impleaded
as per order of this Hon'ble Court
dated 11.08.2015 in Sub Appl.No.416 of 2015]
...Petitioners
Vs.
D.Joseph Jeyasingh,
The Correspondent,
School for the Blind,
Palaymkottai – 627 002. ...Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 21.03.2014 made in W.P.No.33722/2002.
For Petitioner : S.Elamurugan
For Respondent : Mr.T.L.Thirumlaisamy
2
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made a submission that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.33722 of 2002 dated 21.03.2014, has been complied with.
DATED AT MADRAS THIS THE DAY OF 2018.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
FROM 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008 THE REGISTRY IS ISSUING CERTIFIED COPIES OF THE ORDERS/JUDGMENTS/DECREES IN THIS FORMAT.
CO/19/03/2018
To
D.Joseph Jeyasingh, The Correspondent, School for the Blind, Palaymkottai – 627 002.
Jayapaul and others
D.Joseph Jeyasingh
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
