This order dismisses the matter by closing a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition should be closed, and the court recorded this submission and closed the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 23.11.2018
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.546 of 2014
C.Rosammal
...Petitioner
Vs
Mr.A.Jesuratnam, District Educational
Officer, Kuzhithurai Educational District,
Marthandam Post, Kanyakumari Dist.
...Respondent
PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience
of the order of this Court dated 24.1.2013 made in
W.P.No.19921 of 2003.
For Petitioner : Mr.Ziagat Ali
For Respondent : Mr.K.Rajendra Prasad, GA
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
above contempt petition may be closed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) rs //Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
PS/29/11/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt petition No.546 of 2014 for punishment of willful disobedience ought to be closed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Rosammal
Mr. A.Jesuratnam
T.S.Singaravel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
