R. Rangaraj v. Chennai Kesavan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of a court order, the petitioner submitted that the underlying matter was closed. Consequently, the court ordered the contempt petition to stand closed without adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition stood closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
CONT P.No. 514 of 2018
R.Rangaraj
...Petitioner
Vs
Mr.Chennai Inspector of Police, Mettupalayam Town Police Station, Coimbatore District -641301.
...Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt Act praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience and non-compliance of order dated 11.08.2017 of this Court made in Crl.OP. No. 15660 of 2017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Rangaraj
- respondent
Mr.Chennai Inspector of Police, Mettupalayam Town Police Station, Coimbatore District
Coram
M.S. Ramesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court