The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 alleging disobedience of a court order. The respondent submitted that he has complied by passing a fresh order. The court found no reason to keep the petition pending and closed it.
Contempt Petition No.459 of 2018 is closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.03.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
Contempt Petition No.459 of 2018
V.S.Prabhu ... Petitioner Vs. Thiru.Ramasamy, District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Coimbatore. ... Respondent Prayer : The Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent herein for contempt for wilfully disobeying the order dated 22.09.2017 made in W.P.No.25435 of 2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad
For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai G.A.,
When the Contempt Petition was taken up for hearing, Mr.M.Elumalai, learned Government Advocate appearing for
the respondent submitted that the respondent had complied
with the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.25435 of 2017, by passing an order dated 19.03.2018. If the petitioner is aggrieved over the order dated 19.03.2018,
2
passed by the respondent, it is open to him to challenge the order in accordance with law.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has prima facie case to keep the contempt petition pending.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.S.Prabhu
Thiru.Ramasamy
M. DURAISWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
