In this contempt petition filed for non-compliance, the respondent argued that the earlier order was complied with. The court held no further adjudication was required and closed the petition.
The contempt petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
CONTEMPT PETITION No.323 of 2018
J.Deepchand ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.S.Palanisamy, The Director of School Education, College Road, DPI Campus, Chennai-600 006. ...Respondent Prayer: The Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for noncompliance of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court made in W.P.No.25426 of 2017 dated 22.09.2017 For Petitioner : Mr.J.S.Arun Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.P.Kavitha Government Advocate O R D E R The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent made a submission that the order passed by this Court on 22.09.2017 in W.P.No.25426 of 2017 has been complied with. In this regard, the District Educational Officer passed an order in proceedings dated 06.04.2018.
2
petition is required to be undertaken. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(Comm. Cases)
KP
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2018.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
CO/10/05/2018.
One CC to Government Pleader, SR.6106.
To
The Director of School Education, College Road, DPI Campus, Chennai-600 006.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
J.Deepchand
Mr.S.Palanisamy, The Director of School Education
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
