M.Raghu v. Mr.Sampath
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed this contempt petition for non-compliance of an order dated 11.09.2017 in WP.No.22558 of 2017. Respondent counsel submitted compliance was made same day. Petitioner confirmed. Court closed contempt petition as no case remained.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
Contempt Petition No.29 of 2018
in W.P.No.22558 of 2017
M.Raghu
... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Sampath
The Regional Transport Officer
Redhills
Chennai - 52
... Respondent
Prayer: Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings to punish the
respondent for committing contempt of court by willfully
disobeying the orders of the court passed in
W.P.No.W.P.No.22558 of 2017 dated11.09.2017
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Krishnamoorthy
For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate ORDER This contempt petition is filed for the nonhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ compliance of the order made in W.P.No.22558 of 2017, dated 11.09.2017
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. RAGHU
- respondent
MR. SAMPATH
Coram
M. DURAISWAMY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court