Nagaraj v. Vs Sundaram
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed pursuant to Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, the court accepted the respondent's submission that the prior order had been complied with and closed the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; no costs awarded to any party.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Cont. P.No.2485 of 2018
V.Nagaraj ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr. Sundaram
The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative societies,
Hosur, Krishnagiri.
... Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent for the violation
and disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.29667 of
2017 dated 28.09.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr. M.P.Saravanan
For Respondent : Mr. L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Spl. G.P.
ORDER This petition has been filed to punish the respondent for the violation and disobedience of the order passed by this Courtin W.P.No.29667 of 2017 dated 28.09.2018.
2
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent has complied with the order passed in W.P.No.29667 of 2017
Whether the contempt petition should be closed
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Nagaraj
- respondent
Mr. Sundaram
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court