Drupadh.N.S. v. R.Elangovan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition to punish respondent for willfully disobeying a 2017 order was taken up. Counsel represented that the impugned order was complied with, leading the court to close the petition.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Petition is closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Cont.P.No.248 of 2018
Drupadh N.S ... Petitioner
Vs.
R.Elangovan ... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act to punish the respondent herein for willfully
disobeying the orders of this Court dated 09.06.2017 in
W.P.No.31231 of 2016 and thereby committing Contempt of
Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar
For Respondent : Ms.P.Rajalakshmi Additional Government Pleader.
O R D E R When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that the order passed in W.P.No.31231 of 2016 dated 09.06.2017 of this court has been complied with.
2
- In view of the same, the Contempt Petition is
closed. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the
order passed in the said Writ Petition, if he is so
aggrieved.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DRUPADH N.S
- respondent
R.ELANGOVAN
Coram
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court